The Possibility of Fighting EMF/(RF) With EMF

Protecting living systems from magnetic, electric, electromagnetic fields, and radio frequencies.

(No AI was used, please forgive any grammatical errors)

Before I bring up your hopes by the title of this article, just know that I’m not giving an immediate solution to shielding EMF/RF, [5G], and this is a theoretical possibility of EMF shielding, not a reality at the moment. To my knowledge, the invention was never developed into an actual marketable product, but this does not devalue or take away from the possibility of recreating something similar based off of the patent, or at least understanding that EMF shielding has been achieved before by solely using EMF and can be replicated again. It is also a beneficial way to understand how the frequencies and electromagnetic fields work and why the government is pushing so hard to have us surrounded by the EMF and RFs, as it is much harder to fight against these harmful fields without knowing how they work. Just realize that this invention, however attainable and straightforward it would be to recreate is still just a possibility for now.

So I came across a patent, titled: “PROTECTION OF LIVING SYSTEMS FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS,” and I thought the information from it was worth sharing, so this article is going to explain the patent and simplify the concepts presented that could protect us from EMFs. Just know that this patent was filed in 1994, so it is pretty old, especially in relation to how fast technology has advanced since then, but this doesn’t make it less valuable as the concepts can be applied in the same way today, and this also proves that people have known the dangers that EMFs have on biological organisms for decades. It should make one wonder why the government has known of the dangers for decades and done nothing to protect us, and seems to indicate that all of these technologies were designed in full knowledge of the negative biological implications.

Quick summary of the Invention

The inventions described in the patent develop a type of protective electric, magnetic or electromagnetic field(s) which are either superimposed upon an ambient field which is detrimental to the health of living systems, or incorporated into the electrical circuit of the device which is generating the biodamaging field. Either of these options are successful in “confusing” living cells, which reduces or eliminates the harmful effects of the otherwise biologically damaging field. So pretty much to simplify it, the invention creates a type of EMF, MF, or EF that protects living organisms from the radiation that our 5G, powerlines, devices, etc. emit, by adding a protective field on or in the device emitting harmful EMF, and this confuses the living cells in a sense, eliminating or reducing the harmful effects of the EMF.

What actually generates the field are coils or similar constructs. These coils are driven by signal generators and modulators designed to output fields with properties tuned to counter harmful EMFs. The effectiveness relies on carefully selecting and modulating parameters, frequency, intensity/amplitude, waveform, and timing which can all be adjusted to counter the effects of each unique biodamaging field.

The Negative Effects of EMFs, Failed Shielding Attempts, and Why This Invention is Better at Shielding

ELFs such as those produced by 60 Hz power lines at levels as low as 1 microTesla, have been correlated with an increased risk of some diseases, especially with chronic exposure. Higher rates of cancers such as Leukemia, Lymphomas, and nervous system tumors are greatly increased in children living near power lines and in power line workers. Even low EMF exposure can alter cell function, increase RNA levels, and cause developmental abnormalities. Just holding a phone against your leg or having it rest within a few inches of your body will change the structures of the blood cells and how they behave, and radiation from devices has been shown to cause many cancers, irreversible biological damage, and oxidative stress.

The most common way to protect against harmful fields is shielding the field source, such as enclosing cathode ray tubes or power lines, but this is impractical, incomplete, and extremely expensive. The field can radiate through any openings and is unlikely to be entirely shielded, making it very difficult for these to work without leaking as it would have to be a complete Faraday cage to eliminate the possibility of biological harm. Another method is to balance the field from the source to cancel it out, but in actual practice this cancellation is not complete, and is also very expensive as well. Magnetotherapy and other uses of electric fields have been used to treat pre-existing diseases and ailments, but these options do not address the prevention of these diseases caused by the chronic low level radiation and only aim to treat them.

This invention however was aimed to prevent diseases and cancers caused by ELFs and other fields by modifying the ambient EMFs so that they are rendered harmless and no longer affect biological cell function. This would provide safe long term exposure without any adverse health effects. Unlike other approaches, these inventions offer individual, practical, and effective shielding from the effects of ambient EMF. The advantage that the bioprotective field has over traditional shielding is that traditional shielding is based on material protection, and is not leak proof in most cases, while the bioprotective field can be factored into designs of products, efficiently stopping the problem before it begins. For already distributed products such as power lines, the bioprotective field can still be added on afterward, allowing for shielding still. In addition you cannot be protected from a phones output of radiation while you are using it if you only have traditional shielding techniques available, but if the bioprotective field is built in, it allows a much greater application for handheld devices while still protecting biological systems.

The Exact Mechanics of the Invention and why it Works When Others Fail

The adverse health effects upon living systems such as irreversible cell and tissue damage may be prevented by changing in time one or more of the characteristic parameters of the ambient time varying electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields to which the living system is exposed. This may be done in a variety of ways, for example, by making changes in one or more of frequency, amplitude, phase, direction in space and wave form of the field to which the person is exposed to. As for the time period between changes, these time periods should be less than approximately 10 seconds, and preferably should not exceed approximately 1 second. It doesn’t really matter if the changes occur at regular or irregular intervals, but if the changes occur at regular intervals, the shortest time between changes should be one tenth of a second or greater. If the changes occur at irregular random intervals, the time between changes can be shorter. These changes can be made by adding special time dependent fields to the existing ambient field, or by changing the main features of the original fields over time. The change or changes in the ambient field frequency should be about 10 percent or more of the related characteristic parameters of the field before the change.

So the reason for the change is to protect living systems from the adverse effects of electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields by creating special ambient fields based on the fact that something must be done to confuse the biologic cells so that they can no longer respond to the usual fields found in the home, workplace, and now environment due to 5G towers making it inescapable. Fluctuating fields as mentioned above will prevent the adverse effects of the “usual” environmental fields and create a “confusion” field that impedes the damaging reaction of cells from the radiation.

Certain things like drugs, chemicals, viruses, (if you believe viruses exist), and electromagnetic fields change how a cell works by sending signals from the receptors on the membrane into the inner system of the cell. In the context of this invention, it is unknown exactly how the cells detect these fields, but it was found that you can block the cell’s ability to sense electric or magnetic fields by exposing it to changing fields in specific ways.

For example, a 60 Hz electromagnetic field having a magnetic strength of 10 Tesla can double the activity of the enzyme Ornithine Decarboxylase. If the field is abruptly changed, whether the frequency, amplitude, wave form, direction, or phase at intervals of more than 10 seconds, the enzyme stays doubled. If however, the frequency, amplitude, or waveform parameters are changed at approximately 1 second intervals, the electromagnetic field has no effect and the cells “become confused,” no longer responding to the field. Similar electric fields in tissue with amplitudes ranging from 0.1 to 50 microvolts per centimeter can help in protecting the cells from damage. To create these fields within a cell at 60 Hz, the field strength outside the living systems must be about one million times larger, (between 0.1 and 50 volts per centimeter).

The time between changes in things such as the frequency or amplitude should be less than 5 seconds to get at least some protection from the harmful effects of the fields, but changing it every 0.1 to 1 seconds is much more effective at protecting. If the changes are random, like noise, they can be even faster, less than 0.1 second. For example, using a noise signal with the same average strength as the background signal and frequencies from 30 to 90 Hz can stop harmful effects completely. It works best if the confusion field is present the entire duration that someone is exposed to the harmful fields, but it still helps mitigate effects if it’s there most of the time. The electric, magnetic, electromagnetic fields and radio frequency all damage living organisms, but if the frequency/amplitude are changed within the acceptable time frame, damage can be mostly or entirely avoided.

This change occurring in the field to protect living organisms from harmful fields has been proven to work by running different tests. For example, L929 cells were exposed to an electromagnetic field that switched between 55 and 65 Hz every 1 to 50 seconds for four hours. Afterward the activity was checked of an enzyme, (ODC) connected to cell growth and cancer. When the field was quickly switched between frequencies, every second or less, there was no increase in the activity of the ODC enzyme, meaning that cancer growth was entirely avoided solely by changing the frequencies of the field.

The protective method works best when the electric or magnetic fields around you aren’t stronger than 50 kV/m for electric or 5000 mT for magnetic fields, but it can still work with much weaker fields. The “confusion field,” is most effective if you interrupt the steady signal such as a 60 Hz power line wave using a frequency similar to the natural background field. Protection against radio or microwave signals that are modulated, should result in the confusion field containing frequencies similar to those changes. The strength of the interrupting field should be about the same, or greater than the background damaging field to work best.

Example of one of the Inventions: Blocking the Magnetic Fields Emitted by Heating Devices

Just one example of the possibility of rendering harmless magnetic fields, are of heating devices such as electric blankets, heating pads, curling irons, or ceiling cable/under floor heat sources for the home. The conditions of the current being delivered to these devices should be changed at intervals less than 10 seconds, or if possible at intervals less than 1 second. One method is to turn the current on and off for consecutive 1 second intervals, however this would make the heat source inefficient, as it could only deliver half the average power that the device is designed for. To improve efficiency, it has been shown that when a 60 Hz field is on for a time greater than when it is off, it can still confuse the cell and no biological response will occur. The on time should still be around 1 second, but the off time should not be less than 0.1 seconds for full protection. If this is done, then even devices or systems that generate heat, can still have a bioprotective confusion field generated to counteract the biodamaging magnetic field present.

One possible design that achieves this goal is depicted in Figure 22, (the first image), which illustrates a coil structure formed around a mica based structure, (114). In this setup, the coil labeled H3 is arranged to run antiparallel to coil H2. Figure 23, (the second image), presents a circuit designed to control the heating coils from Figure 22, where two heating coils, H2 and H3, are connected in parallel so that equal currents flow in opposite directions through each coil.

This setup reduces magnetic field emissions because the coils create magnetic fields in opposite directions that partially cancel each other out. To make the system even safer, you can add another coil around a heat shield, which also blocks heat. Changing the wire thickness changes the coil’s resistance, for example, a coil with 280 turns and certain wire can create a protective magnetic field for the circuit.

This is a very interesting patent that gives us a simple answer to mitigate and even eliminate the damage that EMFs and RFs are causing to biological organisms. We are seeing the effects of leaving electromagnetic fields and radio frequencies unchecked, and this is a solution, though theoretical to some extent it is even more likely to be possible now as this patent was filed decades ago and we could easily replicate the designs now. We can use EMF to battle EMF and RF by generating the bioprotective EMF fields to cancel out the harmful effects of the EMF and RF.

Sources:

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/1d/5e/28/f8d9838116007e/WO1995005128A1.pdf

https://substack.com/home/post/p-162489500

https://www.focus.de/gesundheit/ratgeber/krebs/news/riskante-strommasten-leukaemie_id_2439602.html

https://www.safespaceprotection.com/news-and-info/exposure-to-power-lines-linked-to-cancer/